![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
Washington Tax Alert - September 17, 2009 - Automatic Accounting Method Changes
Washington Tax Alert from Don Barnes, dbarnes@washingtontaxlaw.com September 17, 2009 On August 27, 2009, the National Office issued Rev. Proc. 2009-39 modifying Rev. Proc. 2008-52, which sets forth the procedural rules for obtaining automatic consent for certain changes in methods of accounting. Shortly before Rev. Proc. 2009-39 was issued, personnel from the Office of Chief Counsel participated in a panel discussion regarding automatic accounting method changes. The comments of Chief Counsel personnel during the panel discussion indicate that ambiguities still exist in the automatic consent procedures (even though the two revenue procedures consist of 347 pages), and automatic accounting method changes may be scrutinized on examination to determine if the taxpayer has satisfied the terms and conditions of the revenue procedures. In particular, three specific accounting method changes are prime targets for examination. Taxpayers making these changes must file three copies of the Form 3115, including sending one copy to a special IRS office in Ogden, Utah. In the panel discussion, IRS personnel clarified some points that are favorable to taxpayers:
The National Office personnel discussed one accounting method change that is not considered to be within the scope of the automatic consent revenue procedure even though it is described in the Appendix to Rev. Proc. 2008-52. The change at issue involved an accrual basis taxpayer that deferred the deduction of expenses or interest until they were paid because it incorrectly determined the items were subject to IRC § 267, and wants to change its accounting method to accrue the items. Although this method change appears to be described in both Appendix § 12.01 and Appendix § 14.09 to Rev. Proc. 2008-52, the National Office's position is that the change cannot be made automatically. Law Offices of Donald A. Barnes, PLLC The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation. |